It’s a basic but still weird fact about books that two people’s experiences of the same book can be radically different but equally valid. On the face of it it doesn’t seem possible. When we read a book and find that it sucks, that doesn’t feel like a personal judgment on our part, it feels like an observed fact that everybody else who reads that book should acknowledge — and if they don’t acknowledge it, that means that they suck. It goes against our instincts as a reader that two people can have opposite reactions to a book, and that both reactions can be true.
Source: TIME
42 Notes/ Hide
-
aichudechu likes this
-
tapiocanaif likes this
-
taekwonjew reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
sgunkim reblogged this from englishprof
-
headfortheburrows likes this
-
beerosie likes this
-
smilesingdanceread likes this
-
mardallie likes this
-
jelizabethl likes this
-
englishprof reblogged this from elizs
-
saveoriginalthinking reblogged this from myfriendamy
-
scottcurts likes this
-
burstingbubbles likes this
-
yearnforwondercy likes this
-
alenaslife reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
yulgold reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
yulgold likes this
-
wanderlustywriter likes this
-
patbee likes this
-
trickspinner reblogged this from justsomeblogushouldunfollow
-
un-luckcey likes this
-
reachforcognizancekid reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
justsomeblogushouldunfollow reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
therearenousernames likes this
-
roxanneeeb reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
roxanneeeb likes this
-
taekwonjew likes this
-
elizs reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
michaelstandish likes this
-
hystericalparoxysm likes this
-
celbelrai reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
strictlyalright likes this
-
thelostbookofwitchesofsalem reblogged this from millionsmillions
-
hughbot likes this
-
justsomeblogushouldunfollow likes this
-
millionsmillions posted this
