“In a 1963 New York Times article, Hank Sauer, an all-star outfielder in the ’50s, declared, ‘Any guy who ever says anything bad about Stan Musial has to have something wrong with him.’ Rather than boosting Musial’s post-career popularity, this sort of attitude, no matter how well intentioned, effectively turned Musial into a cardboard cutout, a bygone era’s one-dimensional paragon of constancy, stability, community fealty, and humility, devoid of the temperamental shadings that humanize public figures. A 2007 profile in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch earnestly dubbed him ‘baseball’s Galahad.’” - The Problem With Remembering Stan Musial as Baseball’s ‘Perfect Knight’ by Luke Epplin
Pop-upView Separately

“In a 1963 New York Times article, Hank Sauer, an all-star outfielder in the ’50s, declared, ‘Any guy who ever says anything bad about Stan Musial has to have something wrong with him.’ Rather than boosting Musial’s post-career popularity, this sort of attitude, no matter how well intentioned, effectively turned Musial into a cardboard cutout, a bygone era’s one-dimensional paragon of constancy, stability, community fealty, and humility, devoid of the temperamental shadings that humanize public figures. A 2007 profile in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch earnestly dubbed him ‘baseball’s Galahad.’”

- The Problem With Remembering Stan Musial as Baseball’s ‘Perfect Knight’ by Luke Epplin

12 Notes/ Hide

  1. lukeepplin reblogged this from millionsmillions
  2. theycallmegomer reblogged this from millionsmillions
  3. tonksarooney said: Really, guys, you’re posting this the day of his funeral? Have some class, queue it a day.
  4. millionsmillions posted this