Taste is a difficult thing to arbitrate, making debates like these fun but virtually irresolvable. Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that the participants all share a common assumption, which often remains unexamined. Rushdie puts it simply: ‘Everyone accepts that stories and movies are different things.’ Indeed. But how, exactly? Is one a higher art form than the other? More illuminating? More demanding? Does one strengthen children’s brains while the other is more likely to rot them?
Perhaps it would be best to leave pronouncements of relative quality to the critics, and instead take this opportunity to reflect on the objective differences between books and movies.
Alan Levinovitz, “Think of Bread in General: On Making Books Into Movies.”
10 Notes/ Hide
- greatsincerity likes this
- monalisapisa likes this
- skerrie reblogged this from millionsmillions
- verseofivan likes this
- beyondtheduckpond likes this
- akanegawa reblogged this from millionsmillions
- mfnplainjane likes this
- suspendedfutures likes this
- onehundreddollars likes this
- millionsmillions posted this